------- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-06 16:16 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> It looks like a duplicate of the unfixed part of pr43945.
It is. One can reduce the test case here to something equivalent to PR 43945
comment #12, which is:
module foo_mod
type foo
contains
procedure :: doit
generic :: do => doit
end type
contains
subroutine doit(a)
class(foo) :: a
end subroutine
end module
program testd15
contains
subroutine dodo(x)
use foo_mod
class(foo) :: x
call x%do()
end subroutine
end
We can track the issue in this PR, and I'll close the other one.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-06-06 16:16:37
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44434
