------- Comment #8 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-07 16:56 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > > have a look at PR44406... i believe its the same thing. >
I think it probably is because the patch of mine would lead to code very similar to what exposed PR 44406. However, PR 44406 actually no longer happens on the trunk because it is very likely a duplicate of PR 44164. So can you please verify that this miscompilation still takes place with the current 4.5 branch before I go into all the troubles of looking at what compiles differently and where? Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44258