#include <stddef.h>

struct S {
  int i;
  int j;
};
struct R {
  int k;
  struct S a;
};
struct Q {
  float k;
  struct S a;
};
struct Q s;
int __attribute__((noinline,noclone))
test1 (void *q)
{
  struct S *b = (struct S *)((char *)q + sizeof (int));
  s.a.i = 0;
  b->i = 3;
  return s.a.i;
}
int __attribute__((noinline,noclone))
test2 (void *q)
{
  struct S *b = &((struct R *)q)->a;
  s.a.i = 0;
  b->i = 3;
  return s.a.i;
}
int __attribute__((noinline,noclone))
test3 (void *q)
{
  s.a.i = 0;
  ((struct S *)((char *)q + sizeof (int)))->i = 3;
  return s.a.i;
}
extern void abort (void);
int
main()
{
  if (sizeof (float) != sizeof (int)
      || offsetof (struct R, a) != sizeof (int)
      || offsetof (struct Q, a) != sizeof (int))
    return 0;
  s.a.i = 1;
  s.a.j = 2;
  if (test1 ((void *)&s) != 3)
    abort ();
  s.a.i = 1;
  s.a.j = 2;
  if (test2 ((void *)&s) != 3)
    abort ();
  s.a.i = 1;
  s.a.j = 2;
  if (test3 ((void *)&s) != 3)
    abort ();
  return 0;
}

is miscompiled (in test2 only, I believe I have fixed the other cases
at some point by throttling down maybe_fold_offset_to_component_ref).

We re-construct from

  q.1_2 = (struct R *) q_1(D);
  b_3 = &q.1_2->a;
  s.a.i = 0;
  b_3->i = 3;

via forwprop

  struct R * q.1;
<bb 2>:
  q.1_2 = (struct R *) q_1(D);
  s.a.i = 0;
  q.1_2->a.i = 3;

and the oracle (or VOP construction in 4.3) believes that we can't access
an object of type Q via a pointer to type R (which is correct).


-- 
           Summary: Bogus access re-construction from offset calculation
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: wrong-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44468

Reply via email to