------- Comment #27 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 14:23 ------- Subject: Re: __extension__ keyword doesn't suppress warning on LL or ULL constants
"manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> writes: > I find this output a bit confusing. I find clang's output clearer > http://clang.llvm.org/diagnostics.html. I guess you are talking about the "automatic macro expansion" section of that link? > > In fact, clang's output actually follows more closely what GCC already does > with templates/inline functions. Well, this is obviously a first step in that direction. I'd be more interested in knowing what I can do at *this* step :-) But yes, once I can bootstrap all the FEs with the macro location tracking infrastructure in place with no regression, I guess I'll focus more on the user visible output. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7263
