------- Comment #1 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-09 22:02 -------
I'm VERY much in favour of using something that is not valid C++ syntax, rather
than "<unnamed>"


-- 

redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2010-06-09 22:02:51
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44486

Reply via email to