------- Comment #1 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 22:02 ------- I'm VERY much in favour of using something that is not valid C++ syntax, rather than "<unnamed>"
-- redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-06-09 22:02:51 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44486