------- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 09:06 ------- (In reply to comment #11) > I think this testcase has some other issues at least on the trunk. > sparc_floating_p.isra.0 is produced for 32bit but not 64bit. > > > And then we have: > MEM[(const struct type *)type_1(D)].code; > > Why didn't we just produce an indirect reference here as the const should be > able to be ignored? (CCing Richard about that part).
There are no more INDIRECT_REFs. The above is type_1->code, just not pretty printed as such. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37060
