------- Comment #39 from rogerio at rilhas dot com 2010-08-13 14:48 ------- (In reply to comment #35) > > char* p1=(char*)0x3000; // address not pointing to any "C-object in the C99 > > sense" > > char* p2=(char*)0x4000; // address not pointing to any "C-object in the C99 > > sense" > > > > Can GCC users trust that p2-p1 will always return a predictable and well > > defined integer value of 0x1000 on any platform with 16-bit or more that GCC > > currently supports or that will come to support in the future? > [ ] Yes > [x] No
Thanks. The comunity will be alerted to this. I'll get back to you when your name is in some famous place associated with this claim. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45265
