------- Comment #7 from lpsmith at u dot washington dot edu 2010-08-13 21:14 ------- You're right! Sorry; I apparently jumped to a conclusion while testing (but I did test!)
I still disagree that an 'e' with no digit following can be reasonably construed as part of an improperly-formatted float, and think it should instead be considered not part of the float at all, since properly-formatted floats have both the e and the digit. I think you are erring on the side of assuming an error when a valid interpretation exists. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45280
