------- Comment #20 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-08-18 03:59 ------- (In reply to comment #19) > as we stated, you wont hit the bug with vanilla gcc + vanilla glibc. we also > arent absolutely stating "this is a gcc bug". our dissection of the problem > lead us from cryptsetup to glibc to what seems like a gcc miscompilation of > glibc. but we arent the gcc experts, so we look to you guys for guidance to > locate the real source of the bug. >
You can link your sigaction.o with another libc.a to show the problem IF the problem is in your sigaction.o. If it is the case, please show me your sigaction.i and CFLAGS used to compile it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45286
