------- Comment #8 from linuxl4 at sohu dot com 2010-08-20 06:50 ------- Error: Dummy 'x' at (1) cannot have an initializer
I think this is easy to understand, an additional short message about why it can't have an initializer will be better. > > It helps if you already state (a) the error message and (b) what you expect > in the first > description. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45337