------- Comment #8 from linuxl4 at sohu dot com  2010-08-20 06:50 -------
Error: Dummy 'x' at (1) cannot have an initializer

I think this is easy to understand, an additional short message about why it
can't have an initializer will be better.

> 
>   It helps if you already state (a) the error message and (b) what you expect
> in the first
>   description.
> 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45337

Reply via email to