------- Comment #2 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-21 16:57 ------- I only get a limited set of errors:
test.f03:188.10: x_dist = pt1 % Get (X_COORD) - pt2 % Get (X_COORD) 1 Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1) test.f03:189.10: y_dist = pt1 % Get (Y_COORD) - pt2 % Get (Y_COORD) 1 Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1) test.f03:217.16: return_value = pt2d % Get (mold) 1 Error: Alternate RETURN statement at (1) is only allowed within a SUBROUTINE test.f03:234.12: return_value = point_2d % Get () 1 Error: Alternate RETURN statement at (1) is only allowed within a SUBROUTINE test.f03:249.21: call point_2d % Print () 1 Error: VARIABLE attribute of 'point_2d' conflicts with PROCEDURE attribute at (1 ) test.f03:273.21: call point_2d % Set (coordinates) 1 Error: VARIABLE attribute of 'point_2d' conflicts with PROCEDURE attribute at (1 ) test.f03:297.29: use Pt3d_mod, only : pt3d_t 1 Fatal Error: Can't open module file 'pt3d_mod.mod' for reading at (1): No such f ile or directory These are currently expected, because the parser does not know pt1 or pt2 are derived-types and thus rejects a component-reference on them. This is what I meant with the statement, that ASSOCIATE is not yet completely working for derived-types, see PR 38936. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 38936 *** -- domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45369