------- Comment #6 from igodard at pacbell dot net 2010-08-28 17:49 ------- Thank you. Don't know about C, but this is C++ in which operators are function. BTW, even in C the standard goes to some lengths in places to make things that look like functions but have odd semantics be defined as macros so as to avoid the semantic guarantees.
If the standard says that C++ argument evaluation semantics is different for the arguments of a pre-defined function vs the arguments of a user-declared overload of the same function then this report is invalid. And I would be very surprised :-) Is Gabe still with you guys? I'd guess he'd know. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45437
