------- Comment #45 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-09-06 13:57 ------- (In reply to comment #44) > Created an attachment (id=21709) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21709&action=view) [edit] > retain redefinition of MAIN_STACK_BOUNDARY as required >
Testsuite results for the PR36502v9.patch are shown in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg00537.html. The compiler ICEs shown for gfortran.dg/backspace_1.f, gfortran.dg/record_marker_2.f, gfortran.dg/graphite/pr42393-1.f90 libgomp.fortran/appendix-a/a.16.1.f90, libgomp.fortran/omp_atomic2.f90, libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-3.c, libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-9.c and 25_algorithms/heap/moveable.cc shouldn't be due to my patch as the identical patch (except for test cases corrections) was tested in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg00168.html and didn't show them. While I don't see these in other reported i386-apple-darwin10 testresults, those aren't using --enable-checking=yes. I will rebuild gcc trunk without PR36502v9.patch, reconfirm those ICEs and file PRs against them separately. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36502
