http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41975
--- Comment #31 from Joaquín M López Muñoz <joaquin at tid dot es> 2010-10-06 11:10:12 UTC --- Paolo, I've read the minutes and seems no strong consensus was reached. I think it'd be useful if the issue can be reopened, at least for informative purposes, so that the committe specify whether it's in the spirit of the standard to allow low memory (singly-linked, one word per node) implementations, and if so what the likely implementations are (I understand this is Pablo's third approach). If this is the case the FCD has to be changed so as to allow erase() to throw. Otherwise implementors will know we have to resort to doubly-linked solutions.
