http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46056
--- Comment #6 from Rodrigo Rivas <rodrigorivascosta at gmail dot com>
2010-10-20 08:56:30 UTC ---
Ok, thank you for the report...
It looks like the range-for temporary completely ignore destructors.
Also, if the range is a temporary it gets destructed quite early, instead of
being kept alive because of the implicit reference.
for (auto x : temp() )
//the temporary is destroyed here
{
//...
} //instead of here
It shouldn't be too difficult to patch, though, so I'll try and have a patch in
a while...
