http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46455
--- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-16 22:36:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) > apparently the 1st overload doesn't match so it falls back to the 3rd one. bah! ok, thanks, back to the drawing board...