http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46455

--- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-16 
22:36:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> apparently the 1st overload doesn't match so it falls back to the 3rd one.

bah! ok, thanks, back to the drawing board...

Reply via email to