http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46589
--- Comment #4 from TonyK <temptony at freemail dot hu> 2010-11-22 00:19:18 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> There might still be a bug here, just not demonstrated very well by the
> original testcase. Here's a version where the definitions of S agree, but gcc
> still defines S::f as local and so the program fails to link:
>
> // file1.cc
> typedef struct { int f(); } S;
>
> int main()
> {
> S s;
> return s.f();
> }
>
> // file2.cc
> typedef struct { int f(); } S;
>
> int S::f() { return 0; }
This is exactly the same as my original submission, isn't it?
