http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
--- Comment #6 from bur...@net-b.de <bur...@net-b.de> 2010-12-29 10:55:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > It seems that we have another TYPE_CANONICAL problem. Kind of. The problem (for this PR and for PR 46818) is that one only generates a gsym for a MODULE; one should also generate a gsym if one USEs a symbol from a module for which no gsym exists. Currently, one generates multiple decls if one USE-associates the same symbole multiple times.
