http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42371
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |mjambor at suse dot cz
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-12
10:43:13 UTC ---
Hi,
the last problem was solved, sadly it is not last. We still keep the functions
around because we don't see that indirect inlining effectively removes the
reference.
Martin probably should look into this for 4.7.
