http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-19 19:44:44 UTC --- > I don't see how this makes any sense. We've identified two bugs in reload, > both > leading to incorrect code, and you'd rather revert the fix for one than fix > both? Yes, because the first one wasn't a regression and fixing the second may well cause a third to pop up, you never know with reload. This is called RM...
