http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47434
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-27 16:35:13 UTC --- I remember the discussion when we first implemented this and we wanted the + on Inf to be consistent with -Inf. Oh well, if folks really feel strongly about this, I can change it all. Hmm, I think I will add the optional NaN type field so now the smallest I can fit will be quite a bit wider then 3. (Just kidding ;) )
