http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47566
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-01 11:53:09 UTC --- I think we need source code (LTO bytecode isn't really portable). It looks like that vuse is somehow bogus - mind posting the output of (gdb) call debug_tree (vuse) at that point?
