http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47577
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-01
22:47:35 UTC ---
Yep. If you play such tricks build the modules with -fno-lto. LTO also
might not support things like
asm(".section foo");
void foo();
with -flto -fno-toplevel-reorder. Toplevel asms are hacks - with LTO
they get quite unmanagable.
