http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47558
--- Comment #49 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-04 10:21:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #38) > This would avoid the need for reverting r163267. I'd rather not revert r163267 because of the behavior described in comment #35. However, I think that libgcc_s.10.5.dylib must be interposed for the -flat_namespace case, as described above. (i.e. patch in comment #24 + Zforce_flat_namespace). > ps If I recall correctly, the Apple developers told me that they do > eventually > intend to get rid of the linkage on -lgcc. Maybe that will happen in 10.7. I intend to get rid of it ASAP - it is only used for eprintf on x86 and eprintf + FP saves on PPC. -- I have patches to do this (but not for 4.6). in test, is a patch that produces the library ordering per clang/4.2.1 for 10.6 - will post later. [ you might want to re-check http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg00274.html would work with -flat_namespace - it's not obvious how it resolves that issue].
