http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567

--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-05 
02:10:39 UTC ---
With:

print "(F0.0)", 0.001 ! => 0.
print "(F0.0)", 0.01  ! => 0.
print "(F0.0)", 0.1   ! => 0.
print "(F1.0)", -0.0  ! => 0
print "(F1.0)", 0.001 ! => *
print "(F1.0)", 0.01  ! => *
print "(F1.0)", 0.1   ! => *
print "(F2.0)", -0.001! => **
print "(F2.0)", -0.01 ! => **
print "(F2.0)", -0.1  ! => **
print "(F0.0)", 0.0   ! => 0
print "(F0.1)", 0.0   ! => .0
print "(F0.2)", 0.0   ! => .00
print "(F0.3)", 0.0   ! => .000
print "(F0.4)", 0.0   ! => .0000
print "(F2.0)", 0.0   ! => 0.
print "(F2.0)", 0.001 ! => 0.
print "(F2.0)", 0.01  ! => 0.
print "(F2.0)", 0.1   ! => 0.
end

I currently get, as patched:

$ ./a.out 
0.
0.
0.
0
*
*
*
**
**
**
0
.0
.00
.000
.0000
0.
0.
0.
0.

Looks reasonable to me. Any other opinions?

Reply via email to