http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-13 12:13:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (a) the first is because LTO has produced two image_info instances with > different mangled names ... > > e.g. L_OBJC_ImageInfo.2044 / L_OBJC_ImageInfo.2048 > > this is visible on darwin 9 (although it does not produce an error). This only applies when -flto is given together with the partitioning algorithm = none. For 1to1 or default, the instances of L_OBJC_ImageInfo are correctly combined into a single var. I'm not sure whether this is expected behavior (c.f. PR43038) ?
