http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41603
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-13 15:54:19
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Just for completeness: The wording in
> J3/04-007 (p. 259, ll. 38-41; "12.3.2.1 Interface block")
> and in
> J3/97-007r2 (p. 194, ll. 32-34)
> is effectively the same. Thus there does not seem to be any change in the
> normative text. Assuming that there is none, I think concluding that the note
> still holds in F2003 is likely. I think I follow this line of thought and do
> not hand in an interpretation request.
>
> If someone does not think so, we can still do so - an IR is only little work
> for us and does also not take so much work in this case for J3/WG5.
Dear Tobias,
I think that this is a WONTFIX. Please reopen it if you disagree.
Cheers
Paul
