http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
--- Comment #13 from Denis Excoffier <Denis.Excoffier at airbus dot com> 2011-03-21 06:46:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > (In reply to comment #10) > > > (In reply to comment #8) > > So, my question is "does version 'x' work without a DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH set?" > > (that tells us if we have a way forward) > duh ... make that version 'y'. If you take the pure distribution gcc-4.6.0-RC-20110314 and apply the two patches (the patch attached in #4 and included in #5), then - you can bootstrap without error (i can say for C and C++ for the time being) - the xerces-c library compiles ok - my C++ program compiles ok - my C++ program executes ok with no DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH needed - all the dylibs and executable around carry a dependency towards /usr/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib
