http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27557
Brooks Moses <brooks at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |brooks at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Brooks Moses <brooks at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-06
19:54:39 UTC ---
It appears that this underlying issue will also affect C++0x support for
thread-local storage, assuming that it also allows non-POD thread-local
objects. (See links from http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html.)
This is also looking like it's going to be a significant problem for us in the
near future in using OpenMP.
Are there GLIBC and binutils issues filed for the necessary underlying
functionality that Jakub mentions in comment 1? If so, what are they? If not,
what additional information is needed to file a coherent and accurate feature
request there?
