http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40975
--- Comment #8 from dnovillo at google dot com <dnovillo at google dot com> 2011-04-28 17:37:29 UTC --- On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 13:01, jason at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40975 > > Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-28 > 15:57:06 UTC --- > This was broken by the tree-ssa merge, r81764, which introduced STATEMENT_LIST > and caused copy_tree_r to abort on it. Diego, do you happen to remember the > rationale for that? Why can't we copy a STATEMENT_LIST in a > statement-expression? Oh, boy. Sorry. I do not remember why we added that assertion. It may have been to avoid recursing twice, since copy_tree_r is typically called to copy individual statements in a list. So, we never expected to find STATEMENT_LISTs inside a single statement. This may be largely unnecessary now. Diego. > > -- > Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug. >
