http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32164
--- Comment #10 from Ludovic Brenta <ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org> 2011-05-10 08:48:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > This works with 4.4.x and 4.5.x: > > pak1.ads:2:09: prefix of "Unrestricted_Access" attribute cannot be intrinsic I wouldn't qualify this as "working". The test program does not use Unrestricted_Access and I think it is legal, so GCC should not reject it. I think this is in fact another bug which hides PR32164.
