http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302
William J. Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-07
13:16:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Well, it fails at the -O0 (non-LTO) link. Hmm. The testcase is from PR47566.
OK. So the LTO writer assumed -O2 -ffast-math, causing the pow calls to be
generated, but at -O0 the gimple expand code for pow was skipped.
I _think_ that
