http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2011.06.10 12:42:03 CC| |dnovillo at gcc dot | |gnu.org, rguenth at gcc dot | |gnu.org, xinliangli at | |gmail dot com Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-10 12:42:03 UTC --- See the thread starting at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg02285.html (continuing in May). Eventually we agreed that the user-side could be done by a kind of function overload resolution of properly tagged functions (proposed in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg00150.html). No idea if there is anybody working on it.