http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49669
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-07
12:12:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Yes, I know that the code is invalid, but that shouldn't make the compiler
> crash, should it?
No, that's why I confirmed the bug and marked it as a regression.
> For that matter, your proposed correct syntax is also rejected by 4.6.0:
>
> Goo::Goo() : x{Foo(4), Foo(5)} { }
>
> "error: invalid initializer for array member ‘Foo Goo::x [2]"
Yes, but it works with 4.6.1
