http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49686
--- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-09 21:13:52 UTC --- Thanks for the quick fix! (In reply to comment #1) > Does the regression look something like this? For sh, the failures were FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/unexpected1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-eh2.C execution test FAIL: g++.dg/eh/crossjump1.C execution test FAIL: g++.dg/eh/unexpected1.C execution test FAIL: g++.dg/ext/cleanup-10.C execution test FAIL: g++.dg/ext/cleanup-11.C execution test FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr49115.C -O1 execution test ... FAIL: 18_support/exception_ptr/lifespan.cc execution test FAIL: 18_support/nested_exception/rethrow_if_nested.cc execution test FAIL: 18_support/nested_exception/throw_with_nested.cc execution test FAIL: 20_util/function/1.cc execution test FAIL: 20_util/hash/chi2_quality.cc execution test FAIL: 20_util/hash/quality.cc execution test FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/append/char/1.cc execution test FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/append/wchar_t/1.cc execution test FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/cons/char/1.cc execution test FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/cons/char/3.cc execution test ...
