http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140
--- Comment #21 from Sébastien Kunz-Jacques <grokbrsm at free dot fr> 2011-07-20 21:23:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) > Ah, the crypto++ comments were just hijacking an unrelated bug for which no > details have been provided. Please don't do this. Well, the symptoms looked similar: the error also dissapears with -fno-inline, so that it matches the bug report header pretty well. I'll file a bug report for Crypto++.
