http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49948
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-03 13:38:57 UTC --- Which means it is a bug in walk_stmt_load_store_addr_ops then (and indeed that doesn't seem to handle CONSTRUCTOR. Well. Mine then.