http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992

--- Comment #32 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-09 20:28:54 
UTC ---
testing this (all languages, lto bootstrap, compare debug) on darwin 9.

will post comment 6 for review (it's a tidy up anyway unless there's some
gotcha reason for not doing it on some platform).

Index: configure.ac
===================================================================
--- configure.ac    (revision 177599)
+++ configure.ac    (working copy)
@@ -2274,8 +2274,9 @@ case "${target}" in
     extra_arflags_for_target=" -X32_64"
     extra_nmflags_for_target=" -B -X32_64"
     ;;
-  *-*-darwin[[3-9]]*)
-    # ranlib before Darwin10 requires the -c flag to look at common symbols.
+  *-*-darwin[[3-8]]*)
+    # Some earlier (circa 2002) version of Darwin required that common symbols
+    # were placed in archive tocs to resolve an issue with g77.
     extra_ranlibflags_for_target=" -c"
     ;;
 esac
Index: gcc/configure.ac
===================================================================
--- gcc/configure.ac    (revision 177599)
+++ gcc/configure.ac    (working copy)
@@ -821,13 +821,11 @@ gcc_AC_PROG_LN_S
 ACX_PROG_LN($LN_S)
 AC_PROG_RANLIB
 case "${host}" in
-*-*-darwin*)
-  # By default, the Darwin ranlib will not treat common symbols as
-  # definitions when  building the archive table of contents.  Other 
-  # ranlibs do that; pass an option to the Darwin ranlib that makes
-  # it behave similarly.
-  ranlib_flags="-c" 
-  ;;
+*-*-darwin[[3-8]]*)
+    # Some earlier (circa 2002) version of Darwin required that common symbols
+    # were placed in archive tocs to resolve an issue with g77.
+    extra_ranlibflags_for_target=" -c"
+    ;;
 *)
   ranlib_flags=""
 esac

Reply via email to