http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50091

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com <pinskia at gmail dot com> 
2011-08-16 17:25:26 UTC ---
Because darwin's as does not support it. It only supports with r0.



Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&amp;T
On Aug 16, 2011 10:13, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
&lt;gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org&gt; wrote: 

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50091



Eric Botcazou &lt;ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org&gt; changed:



           What    |Removed                     |Added

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED

   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011-08-16

         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |ebotcazou at gcc dot

                   |gnu.org                     |gnu.org

     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1



--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou &lt;ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org&gt;
2011-08-16 17:12:00 UTC ---

&gt; Well, look at the PR - it was an ICE with graphite and stack-check, so
yes,

&gt; of course.

&gt; 

&gt;         stw 0,-12284(r1)

&gt; 

&gt; looks like some missing operand print thing to dump fancy regnames (r0
instead

&gt; of 0).



How come the assembler chokes on this?  Looking into it...

Reply via email to