http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45859
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-25 14:28:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > is supposed to be valid according the following IR. A modified program which > uses > call sub (x(10:)) > is unambiguously valid. However, both programs are rejected by: With current gfortran 4.7, the "x(10:)" program is accepted and the other one is rejected for "x(10)" with "must be simply contiguous" (which is true). Thus, the result is OK and only depends on what J3/WG5 regard as correct. TODO: Wait for the result of the IR.
