http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50207
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-29 14:59:43 UTC --- The problem here is not that the first field is aggregate, but that the first field is a fake field for the base class. I'll adjust the patch accordingly.