http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-08-29 18:17:50 UTC --- > > (r171654?). > > Rather not. This one only concerns type-bound procedures (of which Andrew's > test case has none): Sorry to be such a nuisance, but it is: r171653 works, r171654 crashes.