http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227

--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-08-29 
18:17:50 UTC ---
> > (r171654?).
>
> Rather not. This one only concerns type-bound procedures (of which Andrew's
> test case has none):

Sorry to be such a nuisance, but it is: r171653 works, r171654 crashes.

Reply via email to