http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50288
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-05 12:30:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > That sounds reasonable (much better than the evil "double blank" trick). Ok > with me. Can you package it? (This patch, modification to class_45b.f03 w/ comment, and to cray_pointers_2.f90.) As test-suite patch, it probably should probably be rubber stamped by a test-suite maintained such as Rainer Orth.
