http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50407
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-15 16:55:12 UTC ---
I believe the code is invalid due to the recursive IO.
Don't have time now to verify this.
gfortran is looking for a comma because it sees
2 in 2.ip.8 as a statement label. I think gfortran
may be correct in its behavior.
