http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10618
--- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-21 15:46:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > > > The second diagnostic from G++ does not make sense. Clang gives the correct > > diagnostics in that case. > > Ah, that's because you're using 4.5.2 -- stop it! ;) Ah, ok, sorry for the noise. I don't have a recent GCC trunk around anymore. Maybe I will find some free hours to set up one. Or GCC could have an online demo like http://llvm.org/demo? ;-)
