http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693

--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-11 
14:13:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Because the vectorizer analysis occurs fairly early, I guess there is not a 
> lot
> of opportunity to clean up the control flow.
> 
> Should GCC have a memset peephole pass like LLVM?

It does, ftree-loop-distribute-patterns, enabled by default.

Reply via email to