http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50880
--- Comment #26 from Richard B. Kreckel <kreckel at ginac dot de> 2011-11-04 08:17:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) > By the way, if isn't clear already, I would be *really* curious to know which > specific targets by now can't just enable the builtins, eg, their libc doesn't > provide the C99 complex functions. Sadly, the libc functions aren't always correct either. But that is another story: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13305
