http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188

--- Comment #6 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17 20:24:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> It looks like the sorted fields code in lookup_field_1 needs to handle
> using_decl like the unsorted fields code does.  I think this will also fix
> PR51141 (instead of the patch you already posted).

Thanks, I'm current testing the below patch:

Index: class.c
===================================================================
--- class.c    (revision 181436)
+++ class.c    (working copy)
@@ -6000,7 +6000,7 @@ finish_struct_1 (tree t)
      hierarchy), and we want this failure to occur quickly.  */

   n_fields = count_fields (TYPE_FIELDS (t));
-  if (n_fields > 7)
+  if (n_fields > 0)
     {
       struct sorted_fields_type *field_vec = sorted_fields_type_new
(n_fields);
       add_fields_to_record_type (TYPE_FIELDS (t), field_vec, 0);
Index: search.c
===================================================================
--- search.c    (revision 181436)
+++ search.c    (working copy)
@@ -424,8 +424,9 @@ lookup_field_1 (tree type, tree name, bo
           if (want_type)
         {
           do
-            field = fields[i--];
+            field = strip_using_decl (fields[i--]);
           while (i >= lo && DECL_NAME (fields[i]) == name);
+
           if (TREE_CODE (field) != TYPE_DECL
               && !DECL_TYPE_TEMPLATE_P (field))
             field = NULL_TREE;
@@ -433,7 +434,7 @@ lookup_field_1 (tree type, tree name, bo
           else
         {
           do
-            field = fields[i++];
+            field = strip_using_decl (fields[i++]);
           while (i < hi && DECL_NAME (fields[i]) == name);
         }
           return field;

Reply via email to