http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
--- Comment #41 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-12-05 10:12:39 UTC --- Using --param lim-expensive=1 when compiling induct.f90 does not change the timing, as for today (r181994): gfc -Ofast induct.f90 -> 14.62s gfc -Ofast induct.f90 --param lim-expensive=1 -> 14.61s gfc -fprotect-parens -Ofast induct.f90 -> 14.11s gfc -fprotect-parens -Ofast induct.f90 --param lim-expensive=1 -> 14.12s (a ~0.15s improvement over the timing in comment #1).