http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628

--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-20 
11:34:00 UTC ---
> You mean that handling the TYPE_ALIGN != MODE_ALIGN case when
> expanding a MEM_REF (thus, INDIRECT_REF on old branches) won't work?

But you cannot have TYPE_ALIGN < MODE_ALIGN (TYPE_MODE).

Reply via email to